🔍 Read the full analysis: Why Investors Saw Microsoft As A Winner And Alphabet As A Disappointment on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Microsoft shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading after its October 28 results, while Alphabet shares fell about 10%. Both companies reported rapid cloud growth and constrained AI capacity, but Microsoft generated $18.6 billion in free cash flow as Alphabet recorded a $9.1 billion outflow and missed analyst forecasts.
Microsoft shares rose about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading on October 28, after the technology companies reported results that highlighted a key difference for investors: Microsoft generated cash while Alphabet’s spending exceeded its cash generation. Both reported rapid cloud growth and limits on AI computing capacity, but Alphabet also missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising.
Microsoft reported fiscal first-quarter revenue of $92.3 billion, up 19%, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89, above the $4.73 analysts expected, according to LSEG figures cited by CNBC. Azure revenue increased 48% to $33.2 billion, ahead of Microsoft’s prior forecast of 45%. The company reported $18.6 billion in free cash flow for the quarter.
Alphabet’s Google Cloud revenue increased 103% to $30.7 billion, more than twice Azure’s reported growth rate. Yet Alphabet recorded negative free cash flow of $9.1 billion, the second consecutive quarter in which the figure was below zero, according to the source material. Alphabet also fell short of analyst expectations for overall revenue, earnings per share and search advertising. CNBC described the results as the company’s first miss on both revenue and profit in nearly four years.
Both companies are spending heavily on data centers and computing equipment. Microsoft’s cash spending on property and equipment was $39.4 billion, compared with $19.4 billion a year earlier; its broader capital spending figure, which includes finance leases, was $45.2 billion. Alphabet’s capital spending rose 114% from a year earlier, according to the source’s calculations from cash-flow statements. Microsoft’s reported commercial commitments reached $677 billion, while Google Cloud’s backlog was $561 billion. Those contracted amounts are not cash already received.
Infographic 01 · The scorecard
Same night, opposite verdicts.
The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.
The four numbers I said to watch, scored
Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.
| Metric | Microsoft | Alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Capex guidance | Microsoft hold About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter. | Alphabet hold $195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet. |
| 2 · Cloud growth vs. capex | Microsoft hold Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×. | Alphabet hold Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B. |
| 3 · Free cash flow + funding | Microsoft ok +$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders. | Alphabet urgent −$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks. |
| 4 · Capacity | Microsoft hold “Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027. | Alphabet hold “Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead. |
Microsoft
≈ +4%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)
- Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
- Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
- Self-funded build-out
Alphabet
≈ −10%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)
- Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
- Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
- Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares
Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Cash Flow Shaped the Market Reaction
The results show why investors may distinguish between growth rates and the cost of achieving them. Google Cloud’s 103% increase was faster than Azure’s 48%, but Alphabet’s negative free cash flow and earnings misses gave investors additional reasons to question how its investment program is being funded. Microsoft, by contrast, reported positive free cash flow alongside a forecast-beating quarter.
That contrast does not establish which company will ultimately earn more from AI. Infrastructure spending can precede revenue, and cloud backlogs represent future contracted work rather than immediate cash. But with both companies expanding capacity amid strong reported demand, investors are watching whether spending can be funded sustainably and converted into revenue without putting pressure on other businesses.
The market reaction also reflects the companies’ different near-term risks. Alphabet reported raising $28.7 billion in bonds and issuing $12.4 billion in new shares during the quarter, and it did not buy back shares, according to the source material. Microsoft said it had not tapped the bond market and expected to remain free-cash-flow positive for its fiscal year. Those financing details help explain the focus on cash, though they do not by themselves establish the long-term returns from either company’s investments.
Products Worth Considering
HP Sprocket Photo Booth Machine Instant Color Photo Printer with 10.1 Touchscreen, LED Ring Light, 250+ Frames, 3×4 ZINK Paper, QR Code Shar
Samsung 34-Inch ViewFinity S50GC Ultra-WQHD Monitor
Dell UltraSharp 27 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor (U2726DER)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Cloud Growth Meets Capacity Limits
The two companies reported results on the same evening, making the contrast in investor response especially visible. Microsoft’s fiscal year begins in July, so the reported period was its first quarter of fiscal 2027. Its Azure result exceeded the 45% growth rate it had forecast in July. Alphabet’s cloud unit grew faster, but the market also had to weigh the company’s broader revenue and profit misses.
Both management teams described constraints on the availability of AI computing resources. Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood said some third-party capacity deliveries were delayed, pushing planned spending into later periods. Microsoft expects capital spending above $50 billion in the current quarter and an acceleration in the first half of 2027, according to the source account. Alphabet has started renting capacity from third parties, the source material says.
Microsoft’s commercial remaining performance obligation, a measure of contracted revenue not yet recognized, increased 73% to $677 billion. The company said about 30% was expected to be recognized as revenue within 12 months, and the average contract duration was 2.3 years. Alphabet’s Google Cloud backlog was reported at $561 billion. Both measures suggest substantial commitments, but they do not show when all that work will be completed or how profitable it will be.
““Access additional sources of funding when we believe it is attractive.””
— Amy Hood, on Microsoft’s funding plans
Returns and Spending Remain Unsettled
Neither quarter establishes whether the companies’ AI infrastructure spending will generate returns sufficient to justify its scale. Backlogs are not cash receipts, and the timing, margins and eventual completion of contracted work remain uncertain. The source material also says both companies have large future spending commitments that have not yet begun.
Microsoft’s positive free cash flow came in a quarter when some expected capacity deliveries were delayed. That means the figure should not be treated as a settled measure of cash generation once the postponed spending occurs. Hood said spending is expected to rise in coming periods. Alphabet’s negative free cash flow and use of bonds and new shares are reported for this quarter; the information provided does not establish how long that financing pattern will continue.
It is also unclear how much of the share-price moves reflected cash flow alone. Alphabet’s forecast misses and Microsoft’s stronger-than-expected results were part of the same market reaction. After-hours trading can move as investors digest results, and the reported price changes are not a verdict on the companies’ longer-term AI prospects.
Investors Watch the Next Spending Quarter
The next results will show whether Microsoft’s delayed equipment deliveries arrive and whether its capital spending rises as Hood forecast. Investors will also be looking for updates on Azure growth, free cash flow and the timing of contracted revenue recognition. For Alphabet, the next report will help indicate whether Google Cloud can sustain its rapid growth while the company manages heavy investment and returns to positive free cash flow.
Both companies have said demand for AI computing exceeds available capacity, but the source material does not provide a date for when supply constraints will ease. Further results and management guidance will be needed to show whether new capacity translates into revenue and whether spending can be supported by cash generation. Until then, the latest share moves capture investors’ differing assessments of near-term performance and funding risk—not a settled outcome of the AI race.
Key Questions
Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?
Microsoft reported revenue and adjusted earnings above analyst expectations, along with $18.6 billion in free cash flow. Alphabet’s cloud growth was faster, but the company recorded negative free cash flow and missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising.
Did Google Cloud grow faster than Azure?
Yes. Google Cloud revenue rose 103% to $30.7 billion, while Azure revenue rose 48% to $33.2 billion in the reported periods. These growth rates do not, on their own, show which business is more profitable.
What does negative free cash flow mean in Alphabet’s results?
Alphabet reported negative free cash flow of $9.1 billion for the quarter, meaning its cash outflows exceeded cash generated under that measure. The company also raised money through bonds and new shares during the quarter, according to the source material.
Are the cloud backlogs the same as revenue already earned?
No. Microsoft’s $677 billion commercial remaining performance obligation and Google Cloud’s $561 billion backlog refer to contracted work not yet recognized as revenue. They do not mean the companies have already collected that cash, and the timing and profitability of the work can vary.
What should investors watch in the next reports?
Key updates include capital spending, free cash flow, cloud growth and capacity availability. Microsoft has forecast higher near-term spending after delivery delays; Alphabet’s next results will help show whether its cloud growth and cash position change.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
