🔍 Read the full analysis: AI Copyright Rules In Indonesia: What’s At Stake For Tech Platforms? on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Google, Meta and TikTok raised objections to Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing on Nov. 11, 2026. The draft would address AI training, disclosure and creator rights, as well as payments to news publishers for platform uses of their content. The bill is still being deliberated, its current text was not available, and no vote date has been announced.
Google, Meta and TikTok pushed back against parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, as lawmakers consider rules covering both AI and online news. The draft could require payments for platforms’ use of news content, including link previews, and set conditions for AI training and disclosure; it has not become law, and the text currently under discussion was not available for review.
The bill would revise Law No. 28 of 2014, Indonesia’s copyright law. Parliament approved it as a legislative initiative on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is deliberating it with the government. At the Nov. 11 hearing, Baleg heard from the three platforms, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, according to Kompas.
The provisions reported from a July draft would address whether AI-assisted work qualifies for copyright protection, whether AI use must be disclosed, and whether AI systems may imitate a creator’s distinctive style. The draft also proposed that copyrighted works used to train AI models be covered by fair-use provisions or licensing agreements, Reuters reported. The July text was described as preliminary and is not necessarily the version lawmakers are now considering.
On news content, the proposal would require platforms to compensate publishers for uses including aggregation, republication and link previews, with payments handled through state-supervised collective management organisations, according to Reuters’ account of the earlier draft. Google objected to payments tied to indexing and displaying news, while Meta argued that sharing a link is not republication. The companies also raised questions about a single licensing body and platform liability.
AI copyright rules what’s at stake for platforms?
Indonesia is considering new rules for AI training, creator rights and news content. The proposal is still under deliberation, and the current draft is unavailable.
What the proposal could cover
Reported provisions come from a preliminary July draft, not confirmed final text.
Data use and licensing
Training on copyrighted work could fall under fair use or licensing agreements.
Protection and disclosure
The draft addressed AI-assisted work, disclosure and imitation of a creator’s style.
Potential publisher payments
Payments could cover aggregation, republication and link previews.
Platforms’ stated concerns
Their hearing remarks are positions, not settled interpretations or confirmed service changes.
| Platform | Reported concern |
|---|---|
| Payments tied to indexing and displaying news; mandatory AI training licenses | |
| Meta | A link should not count as republication |
| TikTok | Disclosure should not apply when AI only assists a person |
What is still unresolved
Businesses and readers need the final text to understand obligations and effects.
The version discussed at the hearing was unavailable; reports refer to different versions.
Human involvement, disclosure, fair use, licensing and publisher payments remain open questions.
Baleg and the government are reviewing the proposal. No parliamentary vote date has been announced.
Rules Could Reshape AI and News Access
The proposal sits at the intersection of creator rights, AI development and news distribution. If the reported provisions are adopted, developers may face new requirements for training data, and platforms could need to negotiate or pay for uses of publishers’ work. The details matter: the bill’s treatment of training, exceptions and licensing would affect what material can be used and on what terms.
For publishers, compensation could create a route to payment from platforms that display or distribute their reporting. But the Press Council’s account at the hearing presents a different concern about the current balance: deputy chair Totok Suryanto said platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that referral traffic to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent, according to the source material. Those figures were presented by the council; they do not by themselves establish how the draft would affect publisher income or traffic.
For users, Google warned that a levy on links could lead it to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news. That was the company’s stated position, not a confirmed outcome. Whether platforms would change their services would depend on the final law, its enforcement and how companies respond.
Products Worth Considering
Logitech MX Mechanical Wireless Illuminated Keyboard, Clicky Switches
FLEXISPOT 36-Inch Height-Adjustable Standing Desk Converter with Keyboard Tray, Black
Vari Ergo Electric Standing Desk, 54×26, Light Wood/White
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From July Draft to November Hearing
The legislation follows an existing policy. Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024 requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. At the Nov. 11 hearing, Suryanto said the regulation had not worked as intended and that platform compliance was low, according to Aktual. The copyright bill would add a separate legislative framework for payments and rights, though the relationship between the two measures remains to be clarified.
Reuters reported the AI-related clauses on July 17, citing a draft that law ministry intellectual-property official Hermansyah Siregar said was authentic but not final. Siregar said the proposal would be Indonesia’s first explicit recognition of AI in its copyright law and told Reuters that generative AI had disrupted the copyright framework. The draft reportedly excluded fully AI-generated works from protection while offering protection to AI-assisted works that met human-involvement criteria, but it did not specify how much human input would be required.
Google’s objections at the November hearing included mandatory AI-training licenses and a single collective licensing body. The company proposed a text-and-data-mining exception with an opt-out mechanism such as robots.txt, according to reports of its remarks. Meta disputed the idea that linking amounts to republishing, while TikTok said disclosure rules should not apply when AI only assists a person. These are company positions, not settled interpretations of the bill.
“The development of generative AI has disrupted the copyright framework.”
— Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry intellectual-property official, speaking to Reuters in July
Draft Text and Enforcement Remain Open
The bill is still under deliberation. The full version discussed at the hearing was not available in the source material, and reports refer to different versions. As a result, specific provisions and article numbers described in coverage should be treated as provisional, particularly where they derive from the July draft.
Key questions remain unanswered: what counts as sufficient human involvement for copyright protection, how AI-use disclosures would work, what qualifies for fair use or a licensing requirement, and whether a text-and-data-mining exception or opt-out will be included. The scope of any publisher payments, the role of collective management organisations, and the liability protections available to platforms are also unsettled.
There is no announced date for a parliamentary vote. It is also not clear whether platforms would change their products if the draft’s payment provisions are enacted, or how any new rules would affect access to news, publisher revenue or Indonesian-language AI tools.
Parliamentary Deliberations Set the Next Step
Baleg and the government are expected to continue reviewing the proposal and considering input from platforms, publishers and rights organisations. The next concrete developments would be publication or clarification of the current draft, changes to its provisions, and an announced timetable for a vote. None had been confirmed in the available reporting.
Until lawmakers settle the text and parliament acts on it, the reported AI and platform obligations remain proposals rather than binding rules. Readers should distinguish the July draft from any later version and treat company statements about possible effects as positions, not confirmed changes to service or policy.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the AI copyright rules?
No. The proposed revision is still being deliberated by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. No vote date has been announced.
What would the bill require of AI developers?
A July draft reported by Reuters proposed rules on AI training data, disclosure and protection for AI-assisted works. It suggested training could be governed by fair use or licensing, but the draft was not final and the current text was unavailable.
Why are Google, Meta and TikTok objecting?
The companies raised concerns about payments for news links and previews, licensing arrangements, platform liability and AI disclosure. Their statements describe their positions on the proposal, not final legal requirements.
Could Google stop showing Indonesian news?
Google warned that a levy on links could leave it no choice but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news. The company had not announced that it would do so; the outcome would depend on the final law and Google’s response.
When will lawmakers vote?
No vote date has been announced in the available reporting. Parliament and the government are continuing deliberations, and the current draft’s details remain unclear.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
